Well, at the very least we know that something happened in Louisville yesterday and it involved the Louisville Orchestra Inc. (LOI), Louisville Orchestra Musicians Association (LOMA), and Louisville Metro Council President Jim King. To say the least, details are spotty and traditional news outlets are publishing contradictory reports; but here’s what you can reliably piece together so far.
If you’ve been following this saga, you know that final point has been a show-stopper point. Here’s why the consultant’s role is currently unclear:
A LOMA press release from 4/24/2012 states that the agreement “allows for binding arbitration” but goes on to declare provisions for “consultant overseeing operations and making recommendations on a longer contract with the orchestra musicians, as well as about future orchestra initiatives and management policies.”
To say the least, “binding arbitration” and “making recommendations” are typically not in the same ballpark so there are plenty of mixed messages to go around. Likewise, having a consultant oversee operations could be construed to mean that the current LOI executive administrator, Robert Birman, would no longer retain that authority.
Interestingly enough, the only quote from Birman in all of this is from a 4/25/2012 Louisville Courier-Journal article by Elizabeth Kramer wherein she reported that Briman provided a text message stating “We’ll reserve comment until we see the proposal.”
Adding to the confusion is a host of other media reports.
The lack of clear consensus indicates that no one is really certain what’s going on at this point and if that’s not enough, Kramer’s 4/25/2012 article provides a whopper of a tell-tale sign.
“I was told by Chuck Maisch on Monday night that the orchestra board had already approved this agreement with one change that they wanted made that the musicians adopted tonight,” King said, adding that those changes concerned the parameters of the consultant.
Ever since the LOI proposed the notion of binding arbitration back in February, 2012 both sides have differed sharply on the scope and authority any arbitrator could employ. Many lines in the sand were drawn so in an attempt to obtain some verifiable details, I contacted the LOMA press spokesperson and received this reply from an associate who works for the LOMA public relations firm.
…[the consultant] has the latitude to make binding decisions pertaining to the LO management, CBA, and aspects surrounding the orchestra.
Unfortunately, LOMA failed to reply to my request for a copy of the actual agreement and related terms pertaining to the consultant/possible arbitrator. And given the degree of spin from all directions in this labor dispute, it seems like a good idea to verify details before getting too excited about any potential outcome.
For the time being, it would be wise to hang tight until both parties release the complete written terms from whatever it was they signed yesterday. Once they are made public, we’ll take a closer, confirmed, look at the details.
"Maintenance is a breeze. I am so happy that we chose InstantEncore!"