
James strikes a pose with Pieter Wispelwey.
Scroll to the bottom of this post for the amazing opportunity to ask international soloist Pieter Wispelwey anything you like! He’ll be personally responding to reader questions, written in the comments section below, all of this week.
Earlier in the week, the Fellows where lucky enough to have a masterclass with internationally-renowned cellist Pieter Wispelwey, where they worked on the Schubert Octet. Afterwards, cellist James had a coffee with Pieter to discuss Bach, baroque cello and how to manage the hectic performance schedule of a soloist.
James: Anner Bylsma – who plays both modern and baroque cello – was one of your teachers. How did he change your approach towards baroque playing?
Pieter: Well, he was not my baroque cello teacher – I’ve never had a baroque cello teacher. I have no idea how to play a baroque cello except for what I taught myself. And it was basically just spending hundreds and hundreds of hours on a specific baroque cello, and finding out what works and what didn’t work. I had one teacher before Bylsma who prepared me for his school and his methods, and she taught me from childhood until 17 and made me play gut strings on a modern cello. That forced me to be extremely aware of bowing technique issues, as on gut strings you’re penalised when you don’t do it right and on steel strings there is a certain tolerance because you still get a half decent sound even if you bow not straight or you’re not close to the bridge or whatever. With gut strings you need to develop a sophisticated bowing technique.
James: You’ve just recorded the Bach cello suites for the third time…
Pieter: Yes, the third recording is out now, again on the baroque cello. The first one I did when I was 26 or so, and the second one when I was about 34. This time, I did it at an even lower pitch than the usual “baroque pitch”, because apparently in Bach’s time, when he was working at the German court, the pitch they played was a French pitch which was lower than 415 and a lot closer to 392 or 400. So I did the recording at 392 and in concerts now I go down to 400 because my cello prefers that…I think!

The masterclass.
James: Do you think your interpretation of the Bach suites has changed over the three recordings?
Pieter: Yes, your relationship with pieces develops over time. It’s not that your interpretation gets better, it just changes. Maybe privately you think you’re solving more little technical problems that will always be there and you come up with alternative solutions. It’s getting the balance of spices like we did in the octet [for the masterclass]: which herbs do you want to put in, the garlic, the pepper, the salt. But that changes over time. If you take a prelude or a courante and you used to give that a friendly character, you can insert a bit of naughtiness there, or other elements of character.
James: What motivates you to play and record so much unconventional cello repertoire, such as the Schumann violin sonata?
Pieter: Well, I’ve already done all the Beethoven sonatas twice, all the Brahms sonatas twice, the Dvorák twice, the Rococo Variations twice, Bach three times, Britten three times… and I will continue with that repertoire. But the number of great cello works is slightly limited and there are some works I find so beautiful that I can’t keep my fingers off!
James: On this Australian tour you’re performing many different works in close succession: the Lutoslawski concerto, Prokofiev’s Symphony-Concerto, Shostakovich, a new John Adams, Elgar and all the Bach suites. How do you keep everything at concert standard?
Pieter: Well, I just have to practise hard! A piece like the Lutoslawski, I do know it quite well, but having it memorised, including the orchestral score so you know what’s happening around you, that’s a lot of work. And the Prokofiev is a monstrous piece; a big, big piece. The Shostakovich first concerto is a piece you do on a regular basis, so that’s more under the fingers so to speak. I just practise! Head down!

Warming up for the masterclass.
James: What do you think about ‘old-school’ string playing?
Pieter: There are many different schools of cello playing. The thing is, once you start performing you should forget about anything that has to do with ‘school’. You have to be free. In the violin world there are quite a few young soloists now in their 30s, especially in Europe, who really are inventive and develop a personal voice and style, and style approach. Which is not so much revolutionary, but which means that art is in movement. That maybe is happening a bit less in cello. But we have this massive, massive figure of Rostropovich and the majority of cellists aspired to…not to copy him, but they did end up copying him, or his style approach, so that there was only one way of playing Prokofiev or Shostakovich. But for instance if you really dig deep into the Britten cello suites you will inevitably end up with a personal approach, which has nothing to do with Rostropovich but has to do with your relationship with the composer. The role of the teacher or professor should always be to send the students out into the open with the ambition to be independent and to break away from what they have been taught.
And now, over to the reader! Do YOU have a question for Pieter Wispelwey? If so, now is your opportunity to have it answered by the man himself.
Just write your question in the comments section below, as Pieter will be personally responding to a selection of reader questions posted on this blog over the next week.